Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarbuk von Sensenhorst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Tarbuk von Sensenhorst

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable historical person, no familiar and third party sources. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 13:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  14:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  14:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Neutral - If the claims in the article are true (military officer and notable industrialist), they should be sourced and kept; but I'm skeptical. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:33, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't think that being a navy lieutenant and army captain are particlularly strong claims to notability, but I've added some sources to the article confirming that the subject was the founder of one of Austria's major automotive businesses. Also the German Wikipedia article has as a source the Genealogisches Handbuch des Adels, which is regarded as a successor publication to the Almanach de Gotha, and the second of these Google Books hits says that he won a first prize for something in his Horch, presumably a race, but the snippet displayed by Google leaves us in suspense! Phil Bridger (talk) 17:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand from the deWP article--and there should be one on the company as well. The deWP's  customary disdain of adequate   sourcing for articles like these however does not help. DGG (talk) 22:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.