Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tareq Aakef


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The article is entirely unsourced. Per WP:BLP, "unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". It follows that the entire article must be deleted and may only be recreated with reliable sources.  Sandstein  16:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Tareq Aakef

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This BLP is entirely unsourced. If all the claims were sourced he would be sufficiently notable. The current content is so promotional in tone, its of little of little value, in making a proper balanced article. We can delete the content, while allowing somebody to make a proper sourced bio in the future. Rob (talk) 07:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:V and WP:NOTDIR --Numyht (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N and WP:BIO The tone of this article is inappropriate and very promotional. There isn't a reliable source to establish his notability. Artene50 (talk) 08:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I did a Google search, and looked at all the links that came up, and I could find no information about him, thus notability can't be established, and this article should be deleted.--SJP (talk) 15:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, and clean-up. Googling in arabic gives far more results . Much is web forum posts, etc., but newspaper coverage in, , , , , etc. --Soman (talk) 10:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.