Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarik Shah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Tarik Shah

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Shah does not pass the notability guidelines for musicians. His conviction on criminal charges also are not covered in an indepth enough way to justify having an article on him.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:54, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. [[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|25px]] Ascii002  Talk   Contribs  05:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. [[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|25px]] Ascii002  Talk   Contribs  05:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  18:18, 31 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep There seems to be barely enough recent coverage of his Al Qaeda ties (e.g. here) to meet WP:CRIMINAL (if not WP:MUSICIAN). See also: and   Jinkinson   talk to me  20:55, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep recent coverage, meets WP:CRIMINAL.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 18:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.