Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Chauhan (2nd nomination)

Tariq Chauhan
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

In its current form, this biography of a living person makes no reference to anything that is said by third parties about the subject, and so does not satisfy general notability. The one reference is a press release which makes a passing mention of the subject, which is not independent coverage or secondary coverage. It states that the subject is the co-founder of EFS Facilities Services Group, but an article on that group has been deleted for lack of corporate notability, so there is no good redirect target. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Companies,  and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Written by a just-barely-autoconfirmed sleeper as copyright infringement from a press release. After that was stubbified, revdelled, and draftified and nobody was looking anymore, he pasted the same material back in, where it lasted until the past few hours.  Should be speediable, and the only reason it isn't is because we let the good-hand socks of paid editors vote against reasonable countermeasures against advertising even as obvious as this.  And, btw, EFS Facilities Group wasn't just deleted, it's currently heading very rapidly towards a blacklisting at DRV. —Cryptic 19:26, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Sources in the bad revision—special:permalink/1187098514:


 * WP:BEFORE does not reveal any further usable sources.Delete per the source analysis and my BEFORE which did not yield any other sources that could demonstrate notability.—Alalch E. 21:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect to EFS: The company seems notable, he only gets a mention as the CEO, even in articles about him, they talk more about the company. Oaktree b (talk) 23:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * No, we're not going to redirect this personal name to a disambig. The company has no article on Wikipedia. —Cryptic 01:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per Alalch E. Part of a big promotional/suspected paid editing endeavour. Stifle (talk) 08:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

This a not a fair review process for deletion as the article was blanked out just before nomination.
 * Keep I dont have a problem if the article is deleted if it has no merit. But why was the article blanked out just before the deletion nomination.

Is this some kind of bullying thats going on? The guy is a billionaire and was voted as one of the most powerful businessman in the middle east multiple times.

I can find atleast a million article on wikipedia with not even 1/10th of his notability without any notifications whatsoever. This culture of selective bullying and harassment should stop(2409:4073:4EB1:118F:2D94:5D9B:3BCF:B604 (talk) 12:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC))
 * Comment - Allegations of selective bullying and harassment by unregistered editors with no evidence are usually ignored, even in conduct forums, and especially in content forums. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - No one is proposing to salt the title. The unregistered editor is welcome to create a new draft article that describes significant coverage of the subject, and to submit the draft for review.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - If the unregistered editor really thinks that there is a culture of selective bullying and harassment, they should report it at WP:ANI with evidence, after reading the boomerang essay. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is overtly promotional page with no merit of its own. The sources on the page are trivial. If anyone can find any reliable secondary independent sources with indepth notable coverage on the subject and subject's achievement and work, I will reconsider my vote. RangersRus (talk) 17:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep How on earth can this be promotional when the whole article was vandalized and blotted out by an editor and there is hardly any content left on the page. This discussion is deviod of any credibility whatsoever. It is a bogus review discussion and a sham honestly. Many others like puppets are resorting to supporting the vandalism and unwarranted aggression done on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.118.147 (talk) 05:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Six books featuring Tariq Chauhan

https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Learning_Ecosystems/aRWEEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Tariq+Chauhan%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA46&printsec=frontcover

https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Disruptive_Workplaces/VsoDEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Tariq+Chauhan%22+-wikipedia&pg=PT224&printsec=frontcover

https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/The_10_Best_Performing_Facility_Manageme/knLXEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Tariq+Chauhan%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA27&printsec=frontcover

https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Routledge_Handbook_on_Business_and_Manag/A6ATEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Tariq+Chauhan%22+-wikipedia&pg=PT182&printsec=frontcover

https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Handbook_of_Research_on_Supply_Chain_Res/xwBuEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Tariq+Chauhan%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA232&printsec=frontcover

https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Marketing_Communications_and_Brand_Devel/V0hxEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Tariq+Chauhan%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA197&printsec=frontcover — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.118.147 (talk) 06:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)