Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Kahn (doctor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Tariq Kahn (doctor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

BLP, very thinly sourced, no wikilinks, signed by author. Contested PROD. — Jeff G. ツ 02:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. andy (talk) 14:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * weak delete per nom. I think there might be potential for an article, but as it stands the article is very poor.  Proper sourcing could clean up the issue, but for now I think delete DRosin (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: see also Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ali Khan Mohmand. There's a suggestion that this is part of a walled garden. andy (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I was the admin who deleted a prior version at DR.TARIQ KHAN as an A7. Before deletion I did a quick gsearch to see if I could improve the article to avoid an A7, and couldn't find sources. Glad to reconsider if sources showing notability appear. (FWIW, "signed by author" isn't a deletion reason, it's an editing issue.)-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  17:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.