Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarlo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-23 09:00Z 

Tarlo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced, based on a "little known" video game; very likely a hoax. Awyong J. M. Salleh 10:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No sources, so delete. Conscious 10:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is legit. I cannot speak for the creator of the page, because I don't know them, but it was a small, pretty poor computer game at a school in NSW, Australia. Raget 10:52, 19 February 2007 — Raget (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete as original prodder, I can't find a thing on this. It's either a hoax or totally non-notable. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 11:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Page only recently created, Authors may not have had time to complete page and cite any sources as of yet Thenewman 11:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * User's first edit. Conscious 11:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unreferenced and unverifyable hoax - Peripitus (Talk) 11:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete either not notable or a hoax. A Google search for Tarlo "Dubbo College" brings up one result (a forum: ). No sources cited. Hut 8.5 16:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom SUBWAYguy 00:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This should never have made it to AfD - it was a prime candidate for . - WeniWidiWiki 05:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Been there, tried that, got declined. I personally agree though. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 05:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as I have made some changes based on the one and only reference online, and the nature of the information has been made clear by the first part of the articlePoker me 06:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless acceptable references can be found by the end of this debate. WMMartin 10:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Added even more references. More information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.233.23.232 (talk • contribs). — 220.233.23.232 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment Please have over what constitutes a reliable source here. You'll find that blogs, hand-drawn illustrations, and personal websites are not listed as reliable. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 06:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The source is only proving that there is a book, the same is said about the illustration. The sources are not providing information, just examples. Perhaps they should become external links.Poker me 06:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.