Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarquine Iquar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The situation is exactly the same as in Articles for deletion/Sauscony Lahaylia Valdoria Skolia (about a character by the same author). With respect to merging, see Articles for deletion/Taquinil Selei, also in the same situation.  Sandstein  05:41, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Tarquine Iquar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unsourced. non-notable fictional character bio that is inappropriate for inclusion. delete. Jack Merridew 08:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 08:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 08:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to an appropriate chracter list. Edward321 (talk) 13:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge per previous editor. Debresser (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * merge Any non-trivial character in a notable work should at least have a single line description in a list, and a redirect to it.  A    We're here to provide encyclopedic information--and if the main work is worth covering in the first place, people are likely to want some degree of detail. Why else would you use an encyclopedia  in the first place, if you didn't want detailed coverage?  And,   there is no   valid reason why there should not at least be a redirect.    Anything anyone might want to look up should have a redirect if there's relevant content in Wikipedia.  DGG (talk) 00:45, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to work in question. Nothing in article worth merging though. Savidan 17:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete 86 Google hits, nearly all of which seem to be on information aggregator sites. Abductive (talk) 23:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge If its not a main character, then I agree, just put the information compiled with other minor players of significance, on a character list page.  D r e a m Focus  21:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not sure where the editors above are suggesting we should merge this to, as the series' article redirects to the author. A merge/redirect to a character list would be acceptable, if one existed. Anyway, this article fails our notability guidelines as the character hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. The content within this article fails two of our core content policies as it contains no sources for verification and reads like original research.  Them From  Space  07:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.