Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tartarus (Halo)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge and redirect to List of Halo series characters. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihon joe 03:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Tartarus (Halo)

 * — (View AfD)

Non-notable, both per the primary notability criterion of WP:N and the oh so much more liberal WP:FICT. See also related AfD on Cortana, Articles for deletion/Cortana. I seriously hope noone will argue for keeping of this one though. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 01:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 01:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable -- Selmo  (talk) 02:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 03:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No case made that it is notable enough for an article. Edison 06:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable Halo-cruft. MER-C 07:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete DumGameCruft MiracleMat 07:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete ne absorbeat eas Tartarus ne cadant in obscurum. Or something like that :-) Guy (Help!) 13:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge I think this would fit in fine over at List of Halo series characters. -- Ben (talk) 17:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong merge There's absolutely no reason not to just throw this back to the characters article. Tartarus isn't notable enough on his own, but he's far more than notable enough to have a couple of paragraphs in the character list. -- Kicking222 19:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Kicking222. Usually I wouldn't say this do sub-articles, but it's too far along for a keep vote to hold weight.  Anyway, Tartarus isn't even split into sub-sections; a merge would be straightforward and no information will be lost.  However, it will make the parent article more than just a bit larger.  Hmm... --DavidHOzAu 07:19, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into the Halo characters list. The content is definitely interesting and useful. I've played the Halo series but I learned a lot of stuff I didn't know from the article. Shrumster 08:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into the List of Halo series characters. For now, Tartarus doesn't have a large enough background, and isn't that notable. After Halo 3 however... Ghetto Gandalf 08:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Kicking222. The article should probably have never been split off from the list in the first place, if indeed that is the case. — TKD::Talk 13:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect- If he survived Halo 2 and was going to continue as a character, then maybe, but besides being the final boss level, not much else. Dåvid ƒuchs  (talk &bull; contribs) 19:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect - the article is doubtful to recieve enough sourcing, currently it has none. Fails WP:RS and WP:V, but would fit into the minor list of characters. --Quirex 21:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. Unlikely to have a mention in any third party sources, worth a few sentences along with other minor characters. (Or should I say "keep because he's really pretty"?) Gimmetrow 23:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect It isn't notable enough to have a separated article. Merge with the characters list. FrancoGG ( talk ) 15:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge I oppose the Cortana delete, but I see no reason per WP:FICT to oppose merging this. Peptuck 04:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. Note that other characters with their own article survived more than one version of the game. --gxti 21:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect Not enough background info for the character to have it's own article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by QuillOmega0 (talk • contribs) 05:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.