Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tash Sultana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Adam9007 (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Tash Sultana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable band that fails WP:BAND. No mention on Discogs, Spotify, Napster. Only 18 members on sound cloud. Previously nominated for WP:AFD nomination several days ago, but no one noticed it with no votes. Completely non notable. scope_creep (talk) 11:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 15:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 15:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

This is a young Australian artist who is a self taught musician. She has overcome addiction and psychosis. She is growing an audience particularly through YouTube - videos range from a small audience of 3800 on up to over 1 million. She is starting to tour. So yes, she is new and the impact is small but it is growing. Removal seems inappropriate 184.70.125.198 (talk) 16:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC) Also worth checking her website tashsultana.com which shows the sort of detail that merits keeping this entry.


 * Keep. Snow. Terrible nomination. Top ten. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Undeniably notable, particularly in the last couple of weeks with Hottest 100 and a top ten album in Australia as of today.Boneymau (talk) 03:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. coverage in SBS, ABC & SMH, and charting releases. Doctorhawkes (talk) 05:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - charting album, satisfies WP:NMUSIC. Dan arndt (talk) 09:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Close I don't think they were there three weeks ago when I first looked at them, but fair enough. scope_creep (talk) 12:53, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.