Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TaskJuggler (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 17:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

TaskJuggler
This was deleted through AfD in July. A DRV consensus overturned this deletion in light of new sources providing verifiability. For the sources, please see the DRV before commenting here. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 15:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)


 * ??? Keep. I don't understand the "procedural nomination" comment. The article clearly seems worthwhile although it needs to be expanded. Milton Humason 03:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. What's the point of putting it AfD right after it was reinstated after an DRV consensus? The article can certainly be improved a bit and I'm willing to do it. But not if it gets kicked out again for the same bogus reasons. HeronOfAlex 11:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per the DRV. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:59, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment No no no to the above. The DRV overturned the AfD so the AfD needs to be done again, the DRV did not make this somehow a keep. JoshuaZ 20:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm referring to the evidence presented. --badlydrawnjeff talk 22:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as the DRV relisted due to the possibility of third-party sources being supplied, but the two supplied in the DRV are not themselves enough (two 'how-to' manuals from the same publication). Perhaps if at least one other source could be found that would establish widespread usage...  Tewfik Talk 15:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment How about, , , and ? HeronOfAlex 04:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.