Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Task & Purpose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Ganesha811 (talk) 13:53, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Task & Purpose

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Military news website. Does not appear to readily pass WP:GNG - appears to have only garnered mainstream coverage when the editor resigned in 2018 (WP:ONEEVENT), but otherwise all mentions in reliable sources are passing/trivial, not in-depth. It's a marginal case, but I lean delete and would like to see if others agree. Ganesha811 (talk) 05:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Ganesha811 (talk) 05:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Ganesha811 (talk) 05:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Ganesha811 (talk) 05:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems to be a notable publication based on the number of other notable publications that repost or cite their articles as a source such as, People, Military.com, The Hill, Military Times, CNBC, and Politico. This should be enough to pass WP:WEBCRIT. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, I've fleshed it out a bit with feature coverage like and . Now readily passes WP:GNG (there is even more reporting but like with any source that is indexed by Google as news finding news reports *about* them and not *from* them using the news search function is an immense challenge). Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 16:12, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of reliable sources from reputed and credible websites and news outlets. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC) 12:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.