Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasuku Shinguji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Tasuku Shinguji

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This element of the Super Robot Wars series doesn't establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, these are just made up of unnecessary plot summary, game guide material, and original research. Relevant AfDs include Articles for deletion/Database (Super Robot Wars), Articles for deletion/Arado Balanga, Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías, and Articles for deletion/Ruach Ganeden and more. All discussions resulted to deletion of the nominated articles. Magioladitis (talk) 23:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * While they shouldn't have been. The terms are perfectly valid redirect targets, an option you didn't even consider. You also didn't consider merging even a heavily cut version of the article somewhere and PLEASE bundle some deletions if you use the same reason on all of them. - Mgm|(talk) 00:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect as plausible search term and merge to the main article (or character list) if any verification can be done. No independent notability doesn't mean its not notable at all (it can be notable in the context of the fictional universe). - Mgm|(talk) 00:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: no reliable third-party sources cover this fictional video-game character. An article on this subject cannot exist on its own. The personality descriptions are original research and the background history are over-detailed and in-universe. No out-of-universe angle is offered (or could be found since no third-party reliable sources cover these). Information (appearances and physical appearance) that can be merged into a list are non-descript; they are not unique and do not require author attribution. Jappalang (talk) 02:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: If you removed all the unsourced information there'd be no article anyway. Ryan 4314   (talk) 10:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.