Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasya teles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 23:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Tasya teles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR criteria. She had a role in Skin Trade, but it does not appear to be a particularly substantial one; the others do not appear to be either 1) significant roles in themselves, or 2) roles in notable productions. As it stands, the article contains just two sentences sourced only to IMDB and two charts. This was already PROD'd with the rationale, "Failed to meet WP:ENT, also an unsourced BLP." GABgab 19:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete – aside from The 100 (TV series), her most substantial role to date was probably in the TV movie Damaged (though you couldn't tell that from the IMDb cast list, which is alphabetical). But, bottom line: this actress does not yet cross the WP:NACTOR threshold. Further, the article contains zero inline sourcing, and its only source is IMDb. Also, after searching, I find zero mentions of her in Variety, THR, EW, Deadline, TVLine, The Globe & Mail, and the Vancouver Sun, so she's a clear WP:GNG fail as well. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the actor has not had enough major roles at this point to meet notability guidelines. Right now the article is also an unsourced BLP because IMDb does not count as a reliable source, so I don't understand why this was deprodded. Sro23 (talk) 01:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- non notable actress. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing at all close to convincing and I would've frankly PRODed. SwisterTwister   talk  07:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.