Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tate Multimedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Tate Multimedia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreated article, deleted few months ago through PROD. Concern remains the same: "he coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement." Setting aside the dubious notability of their games, the company has no notability itself - no dedicated, reliable sources focus on it. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR  (talk) 18:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR  (talk) 18:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR  (talk) 18:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Doesn't inherit notability from its children. Apart from the NWR interview, it had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. I'd entertain a redirect, but it's not clear whether it should go to one of its games or somewhere else. A navbox for the dev would be more functional than this article. If someone finds more (non-English and offline, esp. Polish) sources, please ping me. – czar   02:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above editor. Searches returned nothing to show notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.