Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tater Tot the Dog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Tater Tot the Dog

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think Tater Tot is notable enough for his own Wikipedia article. When I googled his name, most of the results had nothing to do with him. The ones that did either quoted this article word for word or were written in a style that was suspiciously similiar.--*Kat* (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Having a discussion currently on the wikipedia notability page about the notability of individual dogs. Essentially the agreement is that third party references make a dog notable. As there are none on the page apart from the IMDB link which only shows the dog as an extra and not as a proper dog actor, I'm going to delete due to the lack of third party notability. Miyagawa   (talk)  12:22, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Sorry, Tator. I can't find any reliable sources backing up your performances, and IMDB doesn't list any roles except "celebrity guest" types. I had no idea dogs could be famous for being famous. Liqudluck ✽ talk  19:34, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Some mentions and limited coverage, but insufficient to establish notability to meet guidelines. I'm also concerned that this animal may be using Wikipedia for self-promotion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, my thoughts exactly. --*Kat* (talk) 01:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: No third party references to establish notability.Coaster1983 (talk) 02:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.