Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatiana Iuel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, nothing here to merge that isn't already in her mother's article &mdash; Caknuck 23:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Tatiana Iuel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wholly non-notable four or five year old, her article is a carbon copy of several others. Delete or merge (which seems to be unlikely). The subject has done nothing of note and her remote position in line of succession to the throne is noted on that article, but does not make her individually notable. Charles 17:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Per my nomination. Charles 17:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, while I did decline to speedy this article, that was only because there is at least arguably an assertion of notability here, and was procedural rather than based on any belief that the article should remain. However, that assertion is quite thin, and I can find little to no source material on this person. Wikipedia is not a genealogical database, and nobility is not notability. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above, especially since this info is in another article. Jauerback 18:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this article merely repeats information contained in the article on Tatiana's mother; when, and if, Tatiana herself becomes notable, then we can add an article on her. Noel S McFerran 18:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep She is a Royal and that makes her notable. scope_creep 18:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * She is not a royal. Charles 18:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 18:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - This person has not "been the subject of published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." Killjoy966 18:55, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Killjoy. --Malcolmxl5 21:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Princess Desirée of Schaumburg-Lippe. Consensus is that non-notable relatives of notable people are mentioned in the notable person's article. Stifle (talk) 23:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Being in the line of succession to the British throne is not inherently a claim of notability, particularly when there are over 900 people ahead of the person (as there are for Tatiana), the person is only 5 years old, and no sources are provided to indicate any media coverage of her life. People much higher in the British line of succession have been deleted per WP:BIO; see Articles for deletion/Marina Ogilvy, Zenouska Mowatt, and Christian Mowatt for a group of people in the top 40 of the succession line whose articles were deleted. --Metropolitan90 05:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Although I'm still at a loss as to why Marina Ogilvy's article deleted, as she was clearly notable and made the news with her pregnancy and marriage. However, I'd agree Delete Tatiana's article. Non-notable, non-royal. Morhange 17:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete or Merge into Princess Desirée of Schaumburg-Lippe. --Brewcrewer 13:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.