Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatiana Platt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Tatiana Platt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Platt just does not rise to the level of notability. The Forbes article has one paragraph in a much longer article that mentions her. It does not rise to the level of significant coverage. The New York Observer is a dead link, but looks to be about her campnay and not her, notability is not inherited. The sources from her own websites just cant be used. The last source is from Dan's Papers which does not look to be a reliable source. to begin with it is a local Hampton's publication covering more the Platt home than the Platt's. Secondly, its editing is shoddy and has perpetrated hoaxes. Actually some have been intentional, but others seem to have just been a result of horrible editorial oversight. There are a few other sources that name check Platt, but only because a friend of her then 19-year-old stepson allegedly raped someone on the roof of their penthouse during a party said stepson had while his dad and stepmom were away. None of this is the stuff of encylopedic notability, but it is the stuff of tabloids. John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Concur with nom. Fails GNG. I did find this, which since it has a big VOTE HERE at the bottom, is probably not neutral. It does nevertheless indicate what she has done, which is not enough to make her notable, further evidenced by the lack of coverage. MB 02:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.