Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatton Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Tatton Group

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Yet another extremely small party, this one only stood in a sole seat in a sole election and then wound up. I therefore feel that it does not measure up to our notability standards and should either be deleted or merged in with the numerous other parties which have run in only one or a small number of races and not achieved any significant impact.Tyrenon (talk) 06:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - very little coverage (this brief mention in the local paper is all I can find), and no impact, so no evidence of notability. Warofdreams talk 12:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Of no notability at all doktorb wordsdeeds 22:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable and secondary sources means subject fails WP:GNG. That, along with the very small scale of the party, means subject also fails WP:ORG, in my opinion.  AdmiralKolchak (talk) 11:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  —Artw (talk) 21:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably worth redirecting to United Kingdom Independence Party - that article doesn't deal with its splinter groups, but potentially might. Shimgray | talk | 18:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.