Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatum Reed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Tatum Reed
Article seems to be an ad masquerading as something else. Also not sure of the notability of the entry. Mystache 00:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not established. --Alan Au 00:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like spamvertisement to me. Bucketsofg✐ 00:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete From what I can tell, she doesn't satisfy WP:BIO or the proposed WP:PORN BIO, and her website doesn't meet WP:WEB. Yank  sox  14:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I can't see why there are any objections to TR's article. She's more about the image than the business and will soon be even more so. All the facts seem meaningful and the info is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.223.242.54 (talk • contribs)
 * Do a Google search on Tatum Reed and compare it to the average porn star, she is already notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.24.145 (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.