Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tau Ceti e


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tau Ceti.  MBisanz  talk 00:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Tau Ceti e

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unconfirmed planet. Per WP:CBALL and WP:NASTRO, we should wait until confirmation or until multiple non-trivial independent sources confer notability on this object before having an article on it. jps (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Move to Drafts. It may be confirmed later.-- Musa  Talk  21:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge Redirect to host star. Seriously does not seem controversial why didn't you do that in the first place. We do this all the time with dubious unconfirmed planets (also make a small section stating that the detection was dubious too because the are notable in the media sense, if you disagree simply redirect).  Davidbuddy9  Talk  21:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems almost everything I do is reverted in the context of astronomy. jps (talk) 21:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I can not see that Jps has edited the article (other than notification of AfD) so how could he have been reverted? Even if he had been reverted, this is not a justification for the AfD proposal. DrChrissy (talk) 22:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * He is referring to his controversial AfD that he once again opened up for List_of_Kepler_exoplanet_candidates_by_ESI Davidbuddy9  Talk  22:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * So the edit actually has no relevance here? DrChrissy (talk) 22:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Unlikely that it would be reverted imo (if he did redirect it). Davidbuddy9  Talk  22:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, or redirect to host star after merge of mergable content, to save 4 years of edit history.  ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  04:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * merge to the host star's article. This is does not need a deletion discussion. WP:MERGE discussions happen on the article talk pages. That a planet has been proposed should exist as content in the host star article. -- 70.51.45.100 (talk) 06:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge what is savageable of it, at least until is confirmed or refuted. --U-95 (talk) 22:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Tau Ceti where it's currently mentioned. SwisterTwister   talk  23:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 09:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to Tau Ceti, which will improve the merge target article as per WP:PRESERVE. The topic is covered in some sources (e.g. ), but may not have enough coverage to qualify for a standalone article at this time. North America1000 09:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Tau Ceti. Already mentioned there and any more would be undue. AIR corn (talk) 02:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.