Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tauqeer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Tauqeer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article consist only of speculations like suspected..., thought to have been..., believed..., reported.... this's against the Wikipedia's rules. Share you thoughts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KATURQUOTE (talk • contribs) 09:48, 2 May 2010


 * Just a note that Tauqeer redirects to Abdul Subhan Qureshi, which is the page that I assume KATURQUOTE is proposing for deletion. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - plenty of sources establishing notability. Just because we don't know who someone is/was, it doesn't mean there shouldn't be an article about the said person. See Jack the Ripper. Claritas (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Well referenced article. As long as the suspicions and speculation is well referenced it's fine. If we removed articles based on this criteria we'd have to delete Lee Harvey Oswald, who was suspected of assassinating John F. Kennedy. Pburka (talk) 17:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - Well referenced article. The "speculation" itself is being done by WP:RS. So no harm in keeping this one.--Sodabottle (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep--Wikireader41 (talk) 18:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.