Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tautology (rhetoric)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   tautology. (non-admin closure) Armbrust  WrestleMania XXVII  Undertaker 19–0  01:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Tautology (rhetoric)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

If a majority of the participants in this AfD vote for "delete," then more than half of the voters will be in favor of deletion. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Not really laughing, maybe because it's not April Fool's Day in California. Please make it clear whether or not you really want the article deleted.  --Trovatore (talk) 05:59, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * We work on UTC here :) lSietf (talk) 08:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Send this back to from whence it came Anarchangel (talk) 09:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete so that it can be deleted; otherwise keep so that it can be kept. This is the signature of Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention), the user who signed this post at 11:26, 1 April 2011 (UTC).
 * Keep so it can be deleted. Delete means it would be kept. (Contradictions are tautologies -- Tautologies are contradictions; round and round we go :) 65.93.12.101 (talk) 11:39, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete It says right in the page that Tautology is unnecessary or unessential.-- Ezekiel 7:19 †Go Buffalo! (sign)† 17:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.