Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tava Colo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Tava Colo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is no automatic notability for supercentenarians. Barring that, does not meet WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 04:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 04:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
 * Delete - Like the last time (with another supercentenarian), being one does not guarantee subject's notability.-- Melaleuca alternifolia  |  talk  21:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: No significant reliable, independent sources establishing general notability exists. Multi7001 (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG Not notable enough to justify a Wikipedia article and there is not significant coverage.RamotHacker (talk) 21:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.