Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tax compliance solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 20:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Tax compliance solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Promotional article for various software programs &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:40, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Removed prev opinion Keep sourcing issues but no promotional problems. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 03:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: I have renamed this page to "Tax compliance software", I believe this is closer to what the article describes. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:34, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. While I haven't read the entire history, the current version is an overview article on an entire category of software.  Which is how most software topics ought to be handled, rather than dozens of promotional stubs about individual packages and firms. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:59, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. The article is currently non-promotional, and although it could use more references and some expansion appears to be an OK article. julianmh (talk) 00:51, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article does need further reliable references and a copy edit. Doesn't appear promotional and does appears to be of encyclopedic value.Pol430 (talk) 00:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.