Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tax credit overpayment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 22:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Tax credit overpayment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Basically a hodgepodge of lousy references, original research, extremely poor editing. Best course of action is to WP:BLOWITUP/WP:JUNK and let someone else start over. – S. Rich (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Snowball keep and fix. No valid rationale for deletion has been advanced. This topic is obviously notable. There is nothing wrong with the article that can't be fixed by editing including, if necessary, stubification. WP:TNT never improves anything. Its principle effect is to make important topics disappear. This type of nomination is a complete waste of time and should not be given a moment's serious attention. AfD isn't cleanup. James500 (talk) 21:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * As regards so-called "lousy sources", I should point out that section 28 of the Tax Credits Act 2002 is the best possible source for this, because the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty means that it quite literally can't be wrong. James500 (talk) 22:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:15, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Deletion is neither necessary nor helpful in starting afresh. WP:TNT is not policy whereas WP:IMPERFECT is. Andrew (talk) 22:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - flawed articles on clearly notable topics should be improved by editing rather than being deleted. Plenty of reliable sources are available to meet WP:GNG. The Whispering Wind (talk) 02:57, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.