Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxation of Carried Interest: An Annotated Bibliography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''delete. another one.'''. - Philippe 23:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Taxation of Carried Interest: An Annotated Bibliography

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced essay containing personal opinion and book reviews; entirely original research. An anonymous IP removed the tags and PROD placed on the article without explanation. Ros0709 (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Delete. This is an apparent essay, written in violation of our OR/synth policies. Wikipedia is does not publish original thought in this manner. Lawrence Cohen  §  t / e  19:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as pure original research and synthesis. B figura  (talk) 21:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and clean up. The topic is a notable one, and the material in the bibliography is what we normally consider reliable sources. This is not originail thought in the sense of someone's new theory. --Eastmain (talk) 00:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment It is notable, but it's pure OR/SYNTH. For what an acceptable annotated bibliography would look like, see: Annotated_bibliography_of_fly_fishing -- B figura (talk) 02:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Like the various other "An Annotated Bibliography" essays, these are apparently dumps from a University of Florida course. (cf. "About the author" at the end of this article). -- Fullstop (talk) 19:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC) ps: not likely a multiple offender, but apparently all SPA accounts of students of the same course.
 * Delete or Move to user space. This is simply a personal essay/notes. While it could be used for research in other articles, it's certainly not appropriate for mainspace. Vassyana (talk) 00:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as violation of WP:NOR. —TreasuryTag —t —c 09:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: to date, eight similar articles have been created within a short timeframe. There is ongoing discussion about them here. Ros0709 (talk) 09:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a WP:NOT multiple offender. There's no obligation to keep it in any form, the author should have known better. WillOakland (talk) 02:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to user space. Like the other "An Annotated Bibliography" articles, these are personal notes. The editor is however apparently familiar with the subjects at hand, and should thus be encouraged to integrate the information from those essays into the appropriate articles. -- Fullstop (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.