Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxi (TV series)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep as invalid nom. FCYTravis 05:18, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Taxi (TV series)
This article is too stupid to be an encyclopedia article. Educational rating of ZERO. Only Americans are familiar to that show205.188.116.8 03:20, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Bad faith and waste-of-time nomination. You gotta be kidding me. 23skidoo 03:29, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as per 23skidoo. isn't there a policy regarding ludicrous anon ip nominations? Anetode 03:31, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. What I want to know is, if we all agree to ignore these B.S. nominations and not even vote for them ... would these legitimate articles end up getting deleted by default? 23skidoo 03:35, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Probably not, an editor would probably re-open the nomination for lack of response. Nevertheless, speedy keep.  I can't assume good faith; this is a bad faith nomination. --Metropolitan90 04:07, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep -- ( &#x263A; drini &#x266B; | &#x260E; ) 03:32, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep -- and give the nominator a warning. --Mysidia (talk) 03:41, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, per 23skiddo and agree with Mysidia. >: Roby Wayne  Talk &bull;  Hist 03:57, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, obviously. I think this is the same anonymous user (different IP though) who nominated WKRP in Cincinnati and 21 Jump Street last Thursday, both of which were kept. Also Laverne &amp; Shirley above. Probably a nuisance nomination. ♠DanMS 03:55, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Taxi was on in Australia. Andy Kaufman and Danny DeVito rose to prominence on the show and it won 18 Emmys. We need a process to stop anonymous users from wasting everyones time in votes such as these while still allowing them to notify of things worthy of consideration for deletion. Capitalistroadster 04:33, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * speedy keep this too please we do not allow anonymous deletions sorry Yuckfoo 04:39, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.