Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxi Voice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Taxi Voice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Allied45 (talk) 09:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  09:29, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  09:29, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  09:29, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  09:29, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. All of the "references" are deadlinked bare URLs to a newspaper that, according to the article, this publication is directly affiliated with — which means that none of them are independent of the subject for the purposes of establishing its notability. Regardless of what the topic is, the notability test is not passed just because its own self-published web presence technically verified that it exists: the notability test is the reception of media coverage it didn't have the power to create and publish about itself, but none of the sources here clear that bar. Bearcat (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and comments. Paleorthid (talk) 22:32, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very minor industry magazine, of interest only to its own readers. SunChaser (talk) 00:27, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Indus Age. Not notable in its own right. Aoziwe (talk) 09:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Most/all of its sources look "deadlink". It requires valid sources. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 08:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.