Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taxon expedition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Taxon expedition

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is about the term given in the title, apparently a neologism coined by the article's author (WP:COI, WP:DICDEF, WP:NEO). A search finds hardly anything. Of the two sources given in the article, the first is by the author and the second isn't about the term: it's not notable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 12:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 12:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - coverage isn't there yet. Nice concept but needs more uptake and 3rd party publicity before it can be an article; no good sources to be found. Despite three new species of me coming out of the first one :) -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable neologism, at least not yet. Agricolae (talk) 16:01, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article falls under WP:COI, but could be re-created at another time using more sourced material. Ventric (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.