Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taya Uddin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Taya Uddin

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Very scant mentions in a couple of websites confirm the subject has done photography work, but that is it. No reliable sources confirm the article's claims to notability. Mkativerata (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Mkativerata (talk) 07:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google links above give no sign of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to meet WP:BIO. Nice photos though. Qwfp (talk) 07:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I don't think this was actually ready to have the BLPPROD removed: I've removed one reference (devolution magazine) as it made no mention to her and therefore did not actually support the claim, and the other reference is a blog, which is not reliable (and the only mention of her in this blog is to attribute the photos to her).  Giftiger Wunsch    [TALK]  07:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes I went back and forth on removing the BLPprod but for me the clincher was getting this deleted in 7 days rather than 10. --Mkativerata (talk) 08:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It may snow before then. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Although it does seem verifiable that this person is a published photographer, this in itself doesn't meet GNG. I couldn't find any hint of independent coverage of this BLP topic by secondary sources. Gwen Gale (talk) 10:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone shows me some coverage that didn't get picked up on GNews (where there were zero hits). This might be possible, as I'd have thought the most likely coverage would be in trade press which won't necessarily be online. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Giftiger. No evidence of significance or notability. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  draftsman  ─╢ 11:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this photographer. Joe Chill (talk) 14:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.