Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taygete citranthes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Taygete citranthes

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:N. Hongsy (talk) 14:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Organisms. Hongsy (talk) 14:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly meets WP:NSPECIES with not just a valid name in published sources but additional description. It's not clear why these pages are being nominated at AfD. KoA (talk) 14:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep seems well-sourced enough to pass WP:NSPECIES. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep No indication of invalidity. would you please stop with these bad nominations? Some understanding of what constitutes a valid name is required before wading into this area. This is getting disruptive. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable per WP:NSPECIES
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 16:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. All species are notable and pass WP:NSPECIES. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.