Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor De Cordoba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 07:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Taylor De Cordoba
Art gallery. (Closing admin: This is a procedural listing. Please count me as neutral. BanyanTree 01:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete mentioned in a few places, but mentions are trivial. Found no non-trivial works about this organization. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The article does not assert notability above the rest for the numerous art galleries in the LA area. Author of article removed db-tag. Michael Greiner 02:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references. Santa Monica Daily Press had a review of about 200 words on a show at the gallery. I think that coverage of an exhibit should count as coverage of the company. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 03:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Thanks for the education in how this all works. I am fascinated and appreciate how this process unfolds. I did remove the db-tag in error. Michael Greiner states "The article does not assert notability above the rest for the numerous art galleries in the LA area." There are other galleries from Los Angeles in Wikipedia. What are the specific criteria that must be met to warrant inclusion? "Notability above the rest" seems to be an imprecise guage for inclusion. Alexdc 06:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes this is a real place, mentioned in the local paper. So are many small businesses.  While I am sure it is a very nice gallery, it is still non-notable.  This is an encyclopedia, not a list of every local business.Obina 09:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is no indication that this gallery stands out among items of its kind.  A "notable" business is one that stands out in some fashion -- either through fame or infamy or uniqueness or importance to the industry.  In most of these, the various NYC galleries will stand out, and yet we rightly do not cover them all.  Any business that is operating in the middle of the pack and doing a good job is certainly admirable, but not probably encyclopedic.  Geogre 11:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete wiki is not a directory nor a listings magazine, which is what the links in the articles are, in actual fact. If I want to be really pedantic, in several of them the gallery is not the primary subject. Ohconfucius 03:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.