Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Kirkham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Taylor Kirkham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Clearly fails GNG, no indication of meeting either WP:NHOOPS or WP:NCOLLATH. John from Idegon (talk) 07:00, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 08:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 08:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 08:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets GNG as per  and  ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs ) ~ 17:25, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Since when is one detailed article, which incidentally only covers about 2 years of his life, enough to make GNG, ? The NYT piece is detailed enough to count towards making GNG, but doesn't get it in and of itself.  The other two are very brief passing mentions in articles about other subjects.  Nothing better in the article. John from Idegon (talk) 02:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:52, 19 July 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Sources are links to stat pages and local articles. Signing with the JBA is not sufficient to show notability.  I see nothing that shows either WP:GNG or WP:NSPORTS is met. Papaursa (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep now that it looks more updated. I can't say I know what the quality was like before, but with my recent edit for the JBA, I can say it looks more like a proper article for at least a typical JBA player. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Am I missing something? Why does it matter if the article looks typical for a JBA player?  How is playing in a minor league a guarantee of notability?, can you explain that to me?  If I am mistaken, please explain why.  If I am not, please justify your !vote. John from Idegon (talk) 06:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm just saying when I look at players like Isom Butler and Niles Malone right now, I barely see any difference between them and Taylor Kirkham's article. Not to mention he is someone that has played for multiple JBA teams this season. I've seen the JBA change players in their teams, but not any JBA players going from one team to another just like that over halfway into the season. Oh, and for what it's worth, I also found an article mentioning that he was also a redshirted sophomore at Moorpark before trying out in the JBA recently. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 04:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Can you share this article please? ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs ) ~ 18:43, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable player. I thought the only good source comes from Yahoo! Sports, but it does not even mention this player. All other sources are from statistics websites, while one source is an interview with the player. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:GNG at all. Runningibis (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * delete Nothing to show the GNG or WP:NHOOPS is met. Playing in the JBA doesn't give automatic notability and neither does being redshirted at a community college.Sandals1 (talk) 14:39, 1 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.