Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taytum And Oakley Fisher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 19:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Taytum And Oakley Fisher

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Joint WP:BLP of twin child actors, not properly referenced as passing WP:NACTOR. As always, the notability test for actors is not automatically passed just because the article lists roles, and requires WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about the actor and their performances -- but five of the six footnotes here are garbage sources like Instagram posts and YouTube videos and other unreliable PR bumf that isn't support for notability at all, and the one marginally reliable source is a short blurb on a soap opera news site, which isn't enough to singlehandedly vault them over GNG all by itself if it's the only non-garbage source in the mix. Further, the roles listed here are entirely bit parts, not "major" starring roles for the purposes of NACTOR #1, and even a "major" role would still have to be supported by GNG-worthy sourcing regardless. Additionally, we have a rule that due to the potential of a Wikipedia article to cause harm to its subject, we have to be especially strict about the notability of minors. There's absolutely nothing here that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to pass GNG on much, much better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Advertising, Internet,  and California.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Boasting about your children's first Instagram photos and implying that they post their photos? Though only an essay, WP:CHILD is still proper guidance, and unless they're in a major feature or series as a lead, this article should be salted until the subjects are able to control their own web presence. I'm very uncomfortable with this article's tone, and the article's editor,, seems to be only writing articles about young child actors and influencers going by their contribs, such as the article for Clements twins which contains an image of the subjects. I strongly ask them to consider another field of interest on any Wikiproject besides subjects who have no choice in what they can currently do.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: This entirely fails both the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Social media posts and YouTube videos just don't cut it for WP:SIGCOV. Concur with others regarding WP:CHILD and the need for a salt. Let&#39;srun (talk) 21:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.