Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tayva Patch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 07:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Tayva Patch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBIO and WP:NACTOR. Kirbanzo (talk) 01:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 01:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 01:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 01:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 01:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 01:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 01:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The obituary coverage is enough to put her over the top for GNG. She also clearly had multiple significant roles in notable films, so that also puts her over the top for actor bios.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 04:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep has some prominent roles in notable productions and has coverage in reliable sources, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:21, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep The article really needs more references for making the article look notable without a doubt. As for this AfD, the subject passes WP:GNG. Sdmarathe (talk) 18:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.