Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tbilisi Youth City Assembly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  01:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Tbilisi Youth City Assembly

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable local group. no sources listed. possible WP:SPAM via creator User:Gegelia which indicates COI issues. Google shows no real hits of notability. . Mbisanz (talk) 03:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete --- no press, most web hits seem to be by Gegelia as well. --- tqbf  03:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  Shiva eVolved  16:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Good Afternoon,

First of all let me ask you whether you are familiar with the work of Tbilisi Youth City Assembly at all or not? If you are not then saying it is no notable local group is incorrect. It is quit notable in Georgian political circles and is authorised by the Parliament of Georgia, Tbilisi City Hall and Tbilisi City Assembly (Sakrebulo).

There are no links for that organisation on the internet becase TYCA does not yet have a website.

Moreover, there are no articles about TYCA, except this one, that were created by me so please do not blame me for writing numerous articles about this organisation. There is indeed nothing to advertise and I do not think it sounds like an advertisment at all. However, I still do think it needs further improvements which I can do by adding more information about particular projects the Assembly implements.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Gegelia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gegelia (talk • contribs) 01:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Gegelia, if what you'd like to do is end this AfD discussion with a "keep" result, what you should do is find two reliable sources that discuss the TYCA in detail. Those could be newspaper articles or print publications, given the low profile your subject has on the web.
 * However, I respectfully suggest that you don't want to do that; what you instead want to do is let this article be deleted, and then recreate it when it has attained a stature that would make a deletion vote untenable. When that happens, you'll find you don't have to bear the burden of defending the article alone; other editors will step in and do that for you. --- tqbf  18:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources establishing notability are found. Nuttah (talk) 18:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but tag as "unsourced" - the concept of a youth assembly is an interesting one. This looks like a youth counterpart of a city council.  If it were a youth club, it would certainly be NN, but it is not.  Since this is not from an English-speaking country, the citation of non-English language sources ought to be acceptable, as should the citation of the Assembly's own website.  I hope Gegelia or his friends can address these issues before the AFD ends.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.