Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tchai-Ovna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Tchai-Ovna

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sources are Yelp, TripAdvisor and other user submitted content. Couldn't find any reliable secondary sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:12, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep A great number of independent restaurant reviews were added, each reference containing in itself tens of reference. Most reviews refer to Tchai-Ovna as a landmark establishment in Glasgow. The venue is also popular with music band concerts, poetry readings and other artistic activities. werldwayd (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Weak Delete, a lot of puffery and promotional language, and only a handful of restaurant reviews to support it all. I'm not entirely convinced that it is notable either as a restaurant or a company.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.