Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tea Jazz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:40, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Tea Jazz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Fails WP:MUSBIO. Only claim to fame is "He got his first shot at doing music on a biggest level in 2010 when he got admitted into the university". Has never featured on any chart of any country. All the sources quoted cannot be taken as WP:RS.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  09:51, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Why do you not consider Vanguard (Nigeria) (founded 1983) and The Nation (Nigeria) (founded 2006) to be reliable sources? They're both well-established news outlets, per WP:NEWSORG. Qwfp (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * . Because in both the cases, its not a news converge, are interviews and are very promotional in nature. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  16:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, the interviews are not promotional, there was a press conference in which several news outlets were present, including The Nation and Vanguard. He also topped City FM 105.1 charts as well as Raypower Radio Charts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzy anslem (talk • contribs) 06:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Tea Jazz was on the performing list for One Lagos last year december. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzy anslem (talk • contribs) 06:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete- subject has not been discussed extensively by RSs. The article looks promotional and lacks any sort of notability. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  13:42, 4 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.