Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tea and Biscuits with Maggie Pritchard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Tea and Biscuits with Maggie Pritchard

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod, lacks coverage in 3rd party sources. Not clear how this might meet notability guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 21:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Shouldnt you figure out how it meets guidelines before AfD? I'm just saying I thought thats what it said. Anyhow Google turns up nothing and neither does a Factiva search. I'm inclined that with literally no hits, teres not much out there to prove it meets the Notability criteria, but I'm new and not sure if there are more narrow criteria. Martin Raybourne (talk) 02:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, as you said, I'm not finding anything from Google news. Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines as a result --RadioFan (talk) 12:05, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can find no coverage to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 14:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Articles have to meet notability. Short monologues aren't notable themselves without outside reference, which this doesn't seem to have from a number of searches. Shadowjams (talk) 08:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.