Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaboy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Teaboy
Was tagged for speedy as patent nonsense, which it isn't. However, appears to be complete bollocks. I did find some news articles about people who are/used to be tea boys, but nothing about a worldwide strike. Googling "Samantha Progden" also gets zero hits.  howch e  ng   {chat} 23:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The worldwide strike did occur, it was just widely under-reported. Which is a shame, really, as it was a step up for teaboys everywhere. You try working the bottom rung of the career ladder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredbaty (talk • contribs) 2006-01-04 00:28:47 UTC
 * Delete. For a news story to get no hits in Google (none for Samantha Progden), then I think it's non-notable enough not to be included here. If someone wants to start a proper article only about the profession of a tea-boy, then let them start from scratch. Evil Eye 01:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-04 02:25Z 
 * Delete pn. Dan 16:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.