Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeachText


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 10:10, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

TeachText

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article about an application for Apple computers appears to be non-notable in reliable sources to indicate significant coverage. It was created in July 2002 by an anon, when the notability requirements were much smaller and unregistered editors could still create new pages. I did, however, find a reliable source from CNET, see here, but that's not enough; all other sources available are self-published such as Wikia. TBrandley (what's up) 20:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 23:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep There seem to be plenty of references to this available via Google Books. -- Trevj (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * keep and find sourcing. As the article states, "It was one of the only applications included with the Mac system software..." which to me implies notability, though admittedly I couldn't find any specific wikipedia notability guidelines for software. At one time this was, as far as I know, the only free (as in beer) text editor for the Macintosh. squibix  (talk)  13:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Plenty of sources found and now included in the article. This AfD should now be able to be non-admin closed. -   &#x0288;  u coxn \ talk 05:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep meets GNG. Insomesia (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.