Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teacher in role


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

from VfD:

"Teacher in role" is not a phrase in the English language. This article is original research. RickK 00:32, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, Original Research. Rje 01:32, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup, the phrase has quite a few google hits. --foobaz&middot;&#10000; 01:43, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup Definitely a real concept, worthy of an encyclopedia as well. This article is awkward though. Starblind 01:50, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment The phrase kind of rings a bell. I'm think I've heard it before. Will try to find out more. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:13, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) Oh, my goodness, tons of Google hits. Most hyphenated, "teacher-in-role." Gallaudet college mentions it in two course listings, lotsa other course listings, lots of mentions in professional-sounding education contexts. There seems to be a educational subdiscipline on the use of drama in education and this seems to be part of it. As nearly as I can make out, the term refers both to a use of drama in teaching ordinary subjects and a method of teaching drama. OK, I have no idea what "teacher-in-role" is, but I know enough now to vote...
 * Cleanup. Definitely a real piece of jargon technical term in the fields of education and drama. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:26, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup, the topic is encyclopedic but IMO this article is completely unacceptable as written, seems like an education major's essay. Wyss 01:25, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup, As an educator myself (who two-finger types and makes horrible typos) I can see the value of this particular article. However, as far as layout and clarity go... I'll stand with Clean-up. Weaponofmassinstruction 03:58, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup grammar, among other things. This has the potential to be a good article.
 * Move under a proper title and wikify it. antifinnugor 21:49, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

end moved discussion
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.