Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeamDrive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

TeamDrive

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Disputed prod. Software doesn't seem notable enough. Per the prod removal, it was first released in January 2009 and I haven't been able to find any secondary reviews. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  --  J mundo 03:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete It just doesn't seem to be notable enough. Sorry. If you can provide sources and the like I would be happy to reconsider. Basket of Puppies 04:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Keep Article This is a new technology which has received strong recongnition in the German language market since its introduction in January 2009. Search Google TeamDrive (in German language). It is just going to be launched internationally these days and you will see similar recognition in the English and US community within the coming 90 days. I would vote for letting this article alive for 90 days and look at the relevance and recognition again. --Dschmuck (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC) — Dschmuck (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment you can include the German language articles into the article, provided they are reliable sources, in accordance with policy. However, are you saying that there aren't enough English language sources right now and if we let the article survive, there may be? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I added external links to a few resources. As I said there are key US magazines and tech journalists evaluation the software and there will be English reviews and testimonials out very soon. --Dschmuck (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, yet another piece of non-consumer "collaboration software". Advertising tone is strong with this one. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as essentially a brief one-sheet. No notability is asserted.  I'm not prejudiced to this coming back as an article should it attain notability and be supported by WP:RS in the future.  Jim Ward (talk·stalk) 19:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.