Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team 9 (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was No consensus to delete . The Land 00:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Team 9
Delete nn band. Its previous nomination for deletion survived with a request that it should be cleaned up, but nothing notable has been added – we still don't know who the band members are! --Bruce1ee 10:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. Since the members are not named, what's the point of keeping it. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 12:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * WTF? Obvious Keep, notable in the mashup/bootleg community. Again, WP:MUSIC is worthless for this band because it cannot legitimately make records and rarely gets radio play.  If you need something to cling tenaciously to WP:MUSIC, then Party Ben's association with the group was noted on VH1.com, and one of their mashups were reviewed on Pitchfork.  If we can speedy delete nn-bands, we should be able to speedy keep notable ones. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 15:19, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * More links that will be added to the article at some point. NME, MTV, Spin, NBC's Birmingham affiliate. Furthermore, one of their remixes was also reviewed in Blender magazine and a few apparently made the Toronto Star's "anti-hit list."  Is this really still a question? --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 20:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, not encyclopedic. Subject's site has no Alexa ranking, Google search for sites linking to subject's site yields only 279 hits. Ergot 20:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as very notable, and easily meeting WP:MUSIC requirements (e.g. 5 and 11). I've cleaned up the article and added some references as well (thanks to badlydrawnjeff for finding those). Turnstep 01:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.