Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Elite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Team Elite

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:ORG. This article is promotional and poorly sourced. Article creator and most registerd contributors have never contributed to any other pages (are likely WP:SPA or WP:SOCK). Anton.bersh (talk) 19:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete — per rationale by, the sourcing is non existent. Celestina007 (talk) 03:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination by ; sourcing is skimpy, thus failing to establish notability--and frankly, I find it amazing being a hacker is something these people would want to advertise via a Wikipedia page! TH1980 (talk) 02:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Do Not meet WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 12:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: I strongly believe it should be deleted because reliable sources are week and this article written just for advertisement purpose. Fails GNG.TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.