Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Fortress 2: The Pyro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Team Fortress 2: The Pyro
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is the only TF2 class that has an article, and its not a very good one at that. Seems more like it should be a subpage of the main TF2 article. The Phoenix Enforcer (talk) 05:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Every TF2 class doesn't need an article, and this isn't even much of a stub. Zachlipton (talk) 05:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any evidence of significant coverage in reliable, published sources, such as newspapers, magazines, books, to warrant this article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Each TF2 class as an article is way better covered by the official TF2 Wiki which has complete focus on TF2 than Wikipedia. All sources also aren't from reliable sources other than Valve's TF2. Lzer (talk) 04:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete due to minimal sourcing to WP:verify notability, making it more appropriate to discuss this as part of the main article. Shooterwalker (talk) 13:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete - consensus seems clear here. No independent notability from Team Fortress 2.  Please Delete and Close so we can focus elsewhere. --Teancum (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.