Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Liddell et al (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 15:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Team Liddell et al
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article has not managed to establish notability since the last 'No Consensus' decision. Mais oui! 06:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletions.   —Mais oui! 06:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the is no interest being taken by secondary sources, because, well, there is no interest. Insignificant. Website hosted by geosites rather says it all. -Docg 09:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The content is certainly in need of radical pruning and a decent reference or two would not go amiss. However, by the relatively inclusive standards of Wikipedia I think that the subject matter may merit continued inclusion. My advice to those wishing its continued existence would be to cut the size down to 25% of the existing content at most . Ben MacDuiTalk /  Walk  11:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * We also NEED independent attestation to its significance. Give me some sources showing a media profile, independent review, etc and I think again. Without that, this can't survive, no matter how pruned.--Docg 15:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * "The content is certainly in need of radical pruning" - just a liddle bit. --MacRusgail 18:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * delete I see no grounds for an assertion of notability, I don't think "first family genealogy group of any type to be enrolled in The Genographic Project" cuts the encyclopedic notability mustard. Pete.Hurd 22:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.