Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Unicorn (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Team Unicorn
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Claim of notability is not sufficiently satisfied by the group as a whole, but by the individual members. There are no mentions of Team Unicorn in News articles from my search and the references used in the article do not relate directly to the ensemble but their song "Geek and Gamer Girls Song" and only further reinforces the group's lack of notability.  James ( Talk •  Contribs ) • 2:32pm • 03:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Without coverage of the band via multiple, non-trivial, published works (please see references) the song could have not been discussed. The provided references cover both the song and the band. At present, I would respectfully disagree with the nomination for deletion. NorthernDragon (talk) 04:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC) 
 * Weak keep - appears still notable as per original AFD which closed as keep. No notable changed have taken place since the original AFD. Only weak because it still could use better references/sources. Tiggerjay (talk) 07:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete.The song passes notability so it warrants an article (yikes! the song's article is terrible!). But the band doesn't, since they haven't done anything else notable. 1292simon (talk) 02:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  22:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:04, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.