Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teany


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 16:23, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Teany

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet criteria for inclusion. Yes, it was founded by Moby, and yes there was a fire, but that's about it. Article is quite old, so I felt it should see more than a speedy or PROD. Notability is not inherited, and being popular or well-know doesn't make a topic notable. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  09:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I added a ref from USA Today that is based on the cafe, with the ref from the fire, I think notability is shown. Passionless   -Talk  07:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - the USA Today article is about the cafe and is not review, for once. The article establishes notability on a national level. I would like to see some more sources that are properly configured, but it is now a keeper. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 10:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It may need rolled into the Moby article. However, it mentions Kelly Tisdale, which provides some useful context for people searching for her to make sure they don't reach Jennifer Tisdale's article by mistake. I know this isn't a strong argument, but it's a factor to consider. —C.Fred (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Procedural note. I don't think this debate was ever listed at Articles for deletion. I'm (re)listing it now. —C.Fred (talk) 22:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I added two more potential references to External links. I would keep this article. Even though its claim to notability is minimal, it still has a claim. Tkotc (talk) 01:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —C.Fred (talk) 22:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Weak keep. Probably of sufficient interest to be included, and wouldn't really fit well within the Moby article.--Michig (talk) 08:38, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.