Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teapigs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   made into teabacon. The Bushranger One ping only 01:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Teapigs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently fails the notability guidelines for having no reliable source. There are at least 2 blog entries and reviews from users in a tea review site, though, don't know if these are reliable sources as they are user-generated. Lakokat 16:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - it's lovely tea but I can't find anything that looks like a reliable independent source for it. If you can, let me know and I'll change my !vote. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: There seems nothing particularly remarkable about this company. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 17:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge into Tetley — it's a brand of theirs pretending to be an upmarket boutique. There's plenty of sources out there discussing this business strategy — I saw something about it in the press myself recently. Warden (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Is this a form of advertising? --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.